From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 3 23:15:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CD316A4E1 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from pop-gadwall.atl.sa.earthlink.net (pop-gadwall.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D1D43D6D for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2006 23:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd-unix@earthlink.net) Received: from fl-71-54-28-212.dhcp.embarqhsd.net ([71.54.28.212] helo=kt.weeeble.com) by pop-gadwall.atl.sa.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1FxXds-0004Ef-00; Mon, 03 Jul 2006 19:15:48 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2006 19:18:26 -0400 From: Randy Pratt To: "Jeremy Messenger" Message-Id: <20060703191826.1cf56769.bsd-unix@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.6 (GTK+ 2.8.19; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone still using x11-wm/fluxbox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 23:15:54 -0000 On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 13:42:20 -0500 "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: > Hello folks, > > Fluxbox is now at 1.0rc2, so it is near ready to move from fluxbox-devel > to fluxbox. I am wondering if there is any users that still are using > x11-wm/fluxbox (0.1.14)? If yes, then I am happy to move from fluxbox to > something like fluxbox-old (got any better name?) but I will not maintain > it as I shall drop it to ports@FreeBSD.org. If I get no reply until > Fluxbox released at 1.0 then the 0.1.14 version will be gone for good. I'm using the older fluxbox and also know of a few others who are also dragging their feet. I've actually had my attention elsewhere and wasn't following the fluxbox-devel but I'll give it a whirl on a test box in the next few days. I doubt I'd request that the old version remain in the tree in any event since I'd keep it along with a few other local ports if I really wanted to stick with the old version. Thanks for the notice though so I can start paying attention :-) Randy --