Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 22:16:07 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU> To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: Next step... Message-ID: <20030627021607.GB22213@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think the next step is to document who dnsadm@ should talk to and how, if you still want a concrete documented thing. I can write it up if it's still needed. If I do it, I think: - From the discussion the site-contact and PGP key approach is now managable (sorry everyone) for things in the TLD. - Same thing for communicating with the people managing the delegated zones. If I'm wrong about those let me know but it seemed that's what we thought was best. There is only one other thing dnsadm@ would need to handle that I can think of and that's the request for a delegation. Is there anyone I could talk to about that to get a feel for what has happened in the past? Or does dnsadm@ already have their procedures for that well established and we don't need to discuss that? Did I miss any forms of communicating they need to do or questions they would need to answer? Since it's new - do we need to discuss how the www/cvsup/ftp sites in the TLD are decided on? Jun said the current set stays which makes perfect sense but do we need to discuss what happens as time goes on? -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030627021607.GB22213>