From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 20 15:13:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD909BFBE2 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 398AB996; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mxq9y3lRFz1Fs; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:08:38 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3mxq9x45CZz2LL; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:08:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:08:37 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: mexas@bris.ac.uk, henk@signature.nl, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time Message-ID: <20150820150837.GL50943@over-yonder.net> References: <201508200724.t7K7OPaQ033554@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <627814EA5632799E98790639@atuin.in.mat.cc> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 15:13:03 -0000 On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 08:32:07AM +0100 I heard the voice of Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus: > > I'm not exactly sure what you're all complaining about. The port > just works fine, it does take a few seconds for make to iterate over > all options, but it's because the port has way too many options. It's a pretty sizable difference... % svn co -r394572 [ Mk, print] % cd print/ghostscript9 % time make -V MAINTAINER doceng@FreeBSD.org 0.903u 0.023s 0:00.92 100.0% 834+264k 82+0io 6pf+0w % ( cd ../../Mk && svn up -r394573 ) Updating '.': U bsd.options.mk U bsd.port.mk Updated to revision 394573. % time make -V MAINTAINER doceng@FreeBSD.org 81.908u 0.070s 1:21.99 99.9% 848+264k 82+0io 5pf+0w And how many times is make(1) gonna have to parse up the makefile and friends when you're running portmaster or poudriere? -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.