From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 22 18:34:32 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6967322B;
 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:32 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.212.175])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45FF19F;
 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id l13so1304501wie.2
 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:34:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=K7HgO/5IjHIoKLaWwI7LNxDp9kRuAqG1EYa9tLVVQG8=;
 b=raWHqk92BE7vruqHeTYw6GNLN+P8fQov2jFEZB3arQgrCr6Zmsbmzn8YeAz61gnYIX
 eBRHvZKCyZb39lnrGPFAaJBe87wYHRGxyNC+Sxy5J2ceFq1XyxLmolgqOyGt7+3/1HxV
 AgBUX8/sPU73LTI8N6ioBdKUYAcuqUhvlHEiS0vOz4m2lb+e4w+TsM2qU/fCiwsKaOer
 WBJB9O17sIijt0ffLYarbyt+sNU4UCQhz/b27OGMfuizzMm1KEXSuq3y+fU4X0XGahZ7
 BaedY7UA851dybR2X+B0tly78jIg9itDphs0xG5pwdT9ZJd6ggDyjC080E4TRQeNXhlM
 KV+A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.90.168 with SMTP id bx8mr5369401wjb.59.1361558070622;
 Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:34:30 -0800 (PST)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.216.74.194 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:34:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201302221933.25718.bschmidt@techwires.net>
References: <201302180246.r1I2kocv064092@freefall.freebsd.org>
 <201302221859.31446.bschmidt@techwires.net>
 <CAJ-VmomCtXoDWfpc+-XK-xBFb7dCCzPtrLDMegCT+ZWL1Ye=xQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201302221933.25718.bschmidt@techwires.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 10:34:30 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ykrOWqWWUeAXwJJ1xoNUKCkHvcc
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmom9sE0dMXCp2Tn=DUFTGhgpH+W2uDHpv5VeDL3+3RgJsw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: kern/176201: [net80211] [patch] 11n station includes unrelated ht
 params into ASSOC_REQ packet
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@techwires.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca>,
 freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack,
 tools device driver development." <freebsd-wireless.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-wireless>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-wireless-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:34:32 -0000

Hi,

Why isn't it a per-node thing for the AP case?

Ie, what should the AP do if the ampdu density it supports is 0 but
the STA AMPDU density on the RX side is 8?



Adrian