From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 00:52:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCC216A418; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.snvacaid.covad.net [66.166.149.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9230B13C46E; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id m0E0GavR059033; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:16:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Received: from [10.0.0.209] (p54.kientzle.com [66.166.149.54]) by kientzle.com with SMTP; Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:16:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tim@kientzle.com) Message-ID: <478AA9E4.2010807@kientzle.com> Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:16:36 -0800 From: Tim Kientzle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <200801080800.m08806jI012963@repoman.freebsd.org> <478A8FFE.8080602@freebsd.org> <478A95F2.1070709@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <478A95F2.1070709@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Tim Kientzle , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Dag-Erling Smorgrav , src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/unzip Makefile unzip.1 unzip.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:52:47 -0000 >> Of course, giving those four ports a build-time dependency >> on the Info-Zip version is arguably the right approach >> in any case. > > That would probably be undesirable because it would mean having to > special case things in the ports tree and/or duplicate code. I'm confused. How is it different from having a build-time dependency on GNU tar? I thought I remembered a few cases where ports installed GNU tar (as a build dependency) and then extracted with GNU tar. This case would seem no different. But I'm far less familiar with the details than you are, so I'll happily bow to your expertise in the matter. Tim Kientzle