Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 11:07:15 -0800 (PST) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: chat@freebsd.org, softweyr@xmission.com Cc: chat@freebsd.org, questions@freesbd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Support for secure http protocols Message-ID: <199712171907.LAA26924@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <34973506.B112548D@xmission.com> from Wes Peters at "Dec 16, 97 07:12:22 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters writes: > So, my question is: if I have the capability (time, interest, etc) to > implement only ONE secure http transport, which one should it be? There > is a draft ieft standard for S-HTTP, but Netscape et al HTTP-SSL seems to > have garnered more support in the real world. I think SSL is more prevalent than SHTTP. Also, there already exists a version of Apache (called Stronghold I think) that includes SSL. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712171907.LAA26924>