From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Thu Dec 31 03:57:06 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B784DB2DB for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 03:57:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c2c:26d8::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5vVT41d5z3hYC for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2020 03:57:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eg.sd.rdtc.ru [IPv6:2a03:3100:c:13:0:0:0:5]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0BV3uoht029130 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Dec 2020 03:56:52 GMT (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: 000.fbsd@quip.cz Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 0BV3uhTi067825 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 31 Dec 2020 10:56:43 +0700 (+07) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: Project information - SMBv2+ To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <16e5725b-ec2f-3222-d20d-fd15e597c12c@gmx.net> <075f31cb-dd13-778d-ed50-3ec7d6f30731@gmx.net> <704a700c-32ff-66eb-6711-5d75099abcd4@quip.cz> <20201230225624.atsnf6u5mmtcu5sw@nerd-thinkpad.local> <8644f79e-3957-3498-efa9-8fbfc7b57581@quip.cz> From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <41400a64-5f0b-295b-399e-711b9b40b6d3@grosbein.net> Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 10:56:36 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <8644f79e-3957-3498-efa9-8fbfc7b57581@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,LOCAL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains * -3.4 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on hz.grosbein.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4D5vVT41d5z3hYC X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2020 03:57:06 -0000 31.12.2020 6:33, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Last time I tried smb with fuse it was unstable and does not allowed me > to configure what to mount where at boot time. > AFAIK fusefs-smbnetfs cannot be used the same way as mount_smbfs in fstab. > So I think smbnetfs is not usable solution in our environment even if it works stable and fast. What are you problems with fuse+fstab, exactly? Have you considered systax similar to the following example for net/glusterfs? gluster1:name /mnt/name fusefs rw,late,backup-volfile-servers=gluster2:gluster3,mountprog=/usr/local/sbin/mount_glusterfs 0 0