Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 20:58:36 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, standards@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CFR: add widely accepted _ISOC99_SOURCE Message-ID: <20030311175835.GB3885@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <200303111736.h2BHaiBL062937@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <20030310061548.GA85361@nagual.pp.ru> <20030310104434.P70629@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030311144501.GA364@nagual.pp.ru> <20030311104943.A88290@espresso.bsdmike.org> <20030311164240.GA2305@nagual.pp.ru> <200303111736.h2BHaiBL062937@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[current@ trimmed...] On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 12:36:44 -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > #define _GNU_SOURCE 1 > > #define _ISOC99_SOURCE 1 > > #define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 199506L > > #define _XOPEN_SOURCE 500 > > #define _LARGEFILE64_SOURCE 1 > > It is requesting contradictory namespaces, and getting what it > deserves. It should not define any of these. After some investigations I found that this usage is Linuxism. In Linux most of this options means not strict environment but "turn this extension on" instead. See my recent reply to Mike about should we even support _ISOC99_SOURCE as Linuxism... -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030311175835.GB3885>