From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 26 14:12:48 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from apollo.emma.line.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC79106564A;
	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:12:48 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DC8123CE50;
	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:54:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E2DE60C.8030902@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:54:20 +0200
From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110617 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
References: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110725155920.GA83490@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: clang compiling ports, take 2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:12:48 -0000

Am 25.07.2011 17:59, schrieb Roman Divacky:
> Hi!
>   
>   
> Flz@ just run another exp-build with CC=clang and CXX=clang++. The results can be
> seen here:
>   
>   
> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9-exp.20110723205754/
> 
> 
> Since the last run we've managed to fix the biggest offenders but that
> uncovered others that need fixing. The "Reason" column was extended and now
> shows "assumes_gcc" which is the lowest hanging fruit :)
>   
> A lot of these failures are trivial to fix (ie. assumes_gcc reason) and prevent
> a lot of other ports from building.
>   
> It would be great if you could skim over the list to see if some of the ports
> you maintain are broken and possibly try to fix them. A small introduction into
> the Clang+Ports can be read at: http://wiki.freebsd.org/PortsAndClang.
>   
> Please focus on the biggest offenders (ie. ports that prevent the most other
> ports from building).

Greetings,

there is one serious issue that spoilt (as discussed with kwm and rene
on IRC) a major part of this -exp run.

Namely: if a port sets USE_GCC=4.2+ (for instance, sysutils/busybox does
that), the Pointyhat build does not install GCC.  I think the bug is in
ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk which is unaware that there are newer clang-based
9-CURRENT systems without gcc.

I hope we can have another -exp run soon that addresses this.

Thanks.

Best regards,
Matthias