From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Wed Nov 4 19:20:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E912A20BAE for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 19:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: from mail-yk0-x235.google.com (mail-yk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 537801A2C for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 19:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@nuxi.nl) Received: by ykdv3 with SMTP id v3so387389ykd.0 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:20:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nuxi_nl.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z0RayQ8PmQEy8JXqlgtFkgWSXXn7M44ZocjiGDaUIsE=; b=Zaq+/jr1gzKw+IXLZDKlb+FRkz9Eq8bLshMWs/sA7WCeZkcqQxdzX1lrYQodxpZQmb pwgl7FPzhlP/HVspJBmdvEUUxoUBDHYoTHq4Kf2MEW1jCDfYfelSZ6LQm0E0ov8l0Afl avGbR7F/jnRMvgjR0jHhshUkkGIPx+WaR8IiuSD5AomVi4V4HZAS3gp7vqPUET7UFoJR TeoOJAvrwjChoT0CNuqTMc9zqlUZh78k0xl4bEpeEnUhBTNLyZK0UeQ6ZrtNs7KJabhD jzm0UCaD0t7h76XnYFqyXqpCuGXQIDWzQANPmi8GEHbJcq1oXH2JenlmblZBn2HC99DN /kEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Z0RayQ8PmQEy8JXqlgtFkgWSXXn7M44ZocjiGDaUIsE=; b=CRAl/EtqLK6bcadmtBdiT/O0WOfEM751lDlgYXdh4Y8Rrd3N+LE8LA2y71dhKM1cj8 ylbXQPYWockJLl1wWfDQyXirGqcEbju0Zd2HGokCloozYruavs04UhTEwqvqr5xwiIkm XfCTNwkKAm/dzb5RnJzrm5tliyWtitflQUT1NNKztEghOYLKqlDs/1ui9iZv9XpwtbAI WkSeHaiQEkq+7ukdIaP/kTMpN3sdEbEPxlHg/+nmq9tafh4JU2tct1wgdbd77DAoD1kn kgvx5Xya9QIS9vWx6Tamj7zKxdJAxuzpgwemZ//MbfJUPkfb2Dt1c+QpYTrfi8mV+lhQ 0KLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQktfxK4N4q4EdWtO6r6HwJce3+OfQv8X+XGxL5MswbBTj+Wxm+3Mj2UJtiXpSdgGDF/mg1D MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.13.228.65 with SMTP id n62mr2643409ywe.302.1446664832410; Wed, 04 Nov 2015 11:20:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.129.105.86 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:20:32 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [84.27.222.46] In-Reply-To: <563A5893.1030607@freebsd.org> References: <563A5893.1030607@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 20:20:32 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Sparc64 doesn't care about you, and you shouldn't care about Sparc64 From: Ed Schouten To: sbruno@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 19:20:33 -0000 2015-11-04 20:12 GMT+01:00 Sean Bruno : > I move that we do NOT produce 11.0 versions for Sparc64 and it should be > dropped from the tree. +1 If people object strongly against this and we do end up releasing 11.0 with sparc64 support, I would propose that we axe it from HEAD not long after branching. -- Ed Schouten Nuxi, 's-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands KvK-nr.: 62051717