From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Dec 13 0:39:16 2000 From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 13 00:39:14 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from smtp01.primenet.com (smtp01.primenet.com [206.165.6.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D51F37B400; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 00:39:14 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp01.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA07015; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 01:37:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr08.primenet.com(206.165.6.208) via SMTP by smtp01.primenet.com, id smtpdAAA67aGNn; Wed Dec 13 01:37:48 2000 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr08.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA26590; Wed, 13 Dec 2000 01:38:58 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200012130838.BAA26590@usr08.primenet.com> Subject: Re: An opaque refcount type To: jhb@FreeBSD.ORG (John Baldwin) Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2000 08:38:58 +0000 (GMT) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: from "John Baldwin" at Dec 12, 2000 12:24:50 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: tlambert@usr08.primenet.com Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The patch to do all this is found at > http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/refcount.patch. If this goes in I'll work > up a manpage to go along with it as well.. Nice... Chuck, I guess it's your turn to speak up about "premature optimization"? 8-) 8-). I'm all for it, since I'd like to avoid mixing more complex semantics in with the implementation, going forward, since that's the type of thing that's very hard to "speed up later". IMO... Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message