From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Feb  5 21:44:49 1997
Return-Path: <owner-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA12808
          for stable-outgoing; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:44:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from logues.rhn.orst.edu (logues.RHN.ORST.EDU [128.193.139.116])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA12776;
          Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:44:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (stevel@localhost)
          by logues.rhn.orst.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id VAA02363; Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 1997 21:44:40 -0800 (PST)
From: stevel <stevel@logues.rhn.orst.edu>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Xfree86 3.2A Beta
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970205214042.2358A-100000@logues.rhn.orst.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



In the Xfree86 FAQ (BETA section) is says that they will release their
next beta (3.2A) towards the end of Feb.  Is this something appropriate to
include in 2.2R?  When this does come out, and it is packaged up, will it
have been compiled so as to be able to install/run on 2.2R if it isn't
included?

-STEVEl