From owner-svn-src-user@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 3 10:08:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-user@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C06E7F6; Sat, 3 May 2014 10:08:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87B6B1B8D; Sat, 3 May 2014 10:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc14-cmbg15-2-0-cust307.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.26.1.52]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s43A8j3F016228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sat, 3 May 2014 10:08:47 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\)) Subject: Re: svn commit: r265187 - in user/dchagin/lemul/sys: amd64/linux amd64/linux32 compat/linux i386/linux From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <844C08D2-4660-456A-9DCE-62A47A411688@bsdimp.com> Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 11:08:39 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <71B0E5B8-0E89-4807-8BFF-351BE4FD189C@FreeBSD.org> References: <201405011402.s41E2lnv074130@svn.freebsd.org> <559801B7-3515-44C1-ABF4-2ED6D7F1A4F4@gmail.com> <20140501162640.GA19112@dchagin.static.corbina.net> <844C08D2-4660-456A-9DCE-62A47A411688@bsdimp.com> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874) Cc: src-committers , Chagin Dmitry , svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-user@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the experimental " user" src tree" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 10:08:51 -0000 On 1 May 2014, at 23:13, Warner Losh wrote: > Anyway, just my humble feedback. I suspect we=92ll get demand to = support linux/arm64 binaries about this time next year based on the = trajectories of the arm64 roll out... There's also a lot of interest in running Android binaries on FreeBSD = (although this needs a bit more work than just the syscall emulation = layer), so I suspect that there'll be quite a lot of interest in ARMv7 = emulation too. Things like ART are nowhere near 64-bit clean, so = Android is likely to be including v7 binaries for quite a while after v8 = becomes mainstream... David