From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 14 14:33:14 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB4D1065673 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1670C8FC12 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QANbb-00011p-1G for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:33:11 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:33:11 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:33:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:32:59 +0200 Lines: 12 Message-ID: References: <209FDCEC-0335-4C1D-9974-ACB2BCFDEC28@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: <209FDCEC-0335-4C1D-9974-ACB2BCFDEC28@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: PAE: Cannot fork X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:33:14 -0000 On 14/04/2011 12:14, Dennis Nikiforov wrote: > There is a legacy piece of custom software that runs only on 32 bit systems, so going to 64 bit is not possible. Some ideas: 1) You can run 32-bit applications on 64-bit FreeBSD (and / or set up a 32-bit jail) 2) You can try booting a snapshot of 9-CURRENT and see if it helps. I think I saw some commits that could have fixed this problem. As far as I can see, 9-CURRENT is quite stable right now (and should be much faster than the 7.x you are proposing to use).