From owner-freebsd-arch Sat Mar 24 0:24:18 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3873837B718; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:24:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (root@gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.133]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f2O8O2f62111; Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:24:04 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <200103240824.f2O8O2f62111@gratis.grondar.za> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG From: markm@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: KAME, IPSec, OpenBSD and FreeBSD References: <20010324.002308.36954645.ume@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20010324.002308.36954645.ume@FreeBSD.org> ; from Hajimu UMEMOTO "Sat, 24 Mar 2001 00:23:08 +0900." Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:25:12 +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I just sent to you directry, then the mail was rejected. I dunno why. > So, I reply to this mail. Many apologies - I'm tuning spam filters. > mark> I am very interested in improving FreeBSD's in-kernel crypto, and > mark> I'd like to use the OpenBSD code. Amongs other things, this will > mark> give us access to excellent hardware encryption. > > Since, KAME is ported to all BSDs which includes OpenBSD, I think it > should be once merged to KAME, then porting to FreeBSD is better. That makes sense to me. > Since IPsec part of FreeBSD came from KAME and IPsec is still working > progress in KAME, I suggest that you should ask KAME guys (especially > itojun) about the possibility of merging. I'll do that. > BTW, I'll start merging recent KAME into 5-CURRENT after 4.3-RELEASE > is out. Great! :-) :-) I'm going ahead with the sys/crypto in the meanwhile (unless this is a bad idea - please let me know) M -- Mark Murray Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message