From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 16:44:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBB637B401 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8E443FBD for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 16:44:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h5HNi0br014975 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:44:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h5HNhxDW014974 for freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:43:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 19:43:59 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030617234359.GA14864@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: ping - release guide... X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 23:44:02 -0000 I've had zero response to the draft of the Release Guide, either privately or on the list. I don't know if that's a good thing or a bad thing. Is it worth following up and passing it on to re@ and portmgr@? Or is it bad beyond repair and I should just forget about it? Private email or reply to the list, I don't care which. I'd just feel weird about going any farther with this if nobody says anything about it... -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |