Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2018 08:28:32 -0600 From: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: stephen@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r485844 - head/math/octave Message-ID: <CACNAnaFjkyP66kh4XmcEO7dLh5R%2BgKnhXd2WxPOS96ySUCfUAA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20181125113856.n272iqvgagvdizaj@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <201811250555.wAP5t5OC014092@repo.freebsd.org> <CACNAnaEOSoPp2znvxix_q6UUVAgc_twbCju8BWoBGUabuaKbgQ@mail.gmail.com> <20181125113856.n272iqvgagvdizaj@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 5:39 AM Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 12:28:00AM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 11:55 PM Stephen Montgomery-Smith > > <stephen@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > > > Author: stephen > > > Date: Sun Nov 25 05:55:05 2018 > > > New Revision: 485844 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/485844 > > > > > > Log: > > > - Make changes to plist that should have been included with r485798. > > > - Bump portrevision. > > > > > > Reported by: pkg-fallout@ > > > > > > > Hmm... my poudriere run did not catch this. =/ > > > > Does poudriere not sanity check the plist in bulk runs? If not, is > > there a way to enable it to, somehow, in a way that isn't going to jam > > me up on all of the dependencies I don't care about? My general > > workflow for this kind of stuff is patch 4-8 ports -> bulk build those > > 4-8 ports -> submit because i was for some reason under the impression > > that poudriere was more pedantic about plist changes. > > By default, bulk only builds the ports, it does not run any qa, > poudriere testport is there for that, but it can be enabled: > > $ man 8 poudriere-bulk > ... > -t Add some testing to the specified ports. Add -r to > recursively test all port dependencies as well. Currently > uninstalls the port, and disable parallel jobs for make. > When used with -a then -rk are implied. > ... > Ahh, right there in the "M" part of RTFM. =) Sorry, and thanks for that! This does indeed seem exactly like what I was hoping for. Kyle Evans
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACNAnaFjkyP66kh4XmcEO7dLh5R%2BgKnhXd2WxPOS96ySUCfUAA>