From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jun 3 19:09:14 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA06476 for current-outgoing; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 19:09:14 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA06457 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 19:09:00 -0700 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id TAA14701; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 19:06:25 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199506040206.TAA14701@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: Some Makefiles incorrectly set LDADD To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com (Rodney W. Grimes) Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 19:06:25 -0700 (PDT) Cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199506032026.NAA16847@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> from "Rodney W. Grimes" at Jun 3, 95 01:26:25 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 646 Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > date/Makefile:LDADD= -lutil > > mv/Makefile:LDADD= -lutil > > ps/Makefile:LDADD= -lm -lkvm > > rcp/Makefile:LDADD= -lkrb -ldes > > sh/Makefile:LDADD= -ll -ledit -ltermcap > ^^^ > LDADD should not be set with a += in a Makefile unless that Makefile > has mutliple LDADD lines with in it. Well, then we will have no easy way to do for instance what the original message said, recompile everything with a particular library :-( -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'