From owner-freebsd-questions  Sat Jun 13 23:02:28 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA24834
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA24816
          for <questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:02:13 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA03914;
	Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:02:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22)
 via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd003905; Sun Jun 14 06:01:59 1998
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 23:01:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: Shawn Ramsey <shawn@cpl.net>
cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ipfw
In-Reply-To: <19980613221938.08547@cpl.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.980613230109.5614E-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

ipfw doens have any "special ports" so yes it does work..
(I use it on ports around 45000)


On Sat, 13 Jun 1998, Shawn Ramsey wrote:

> Does IPFW work on ports above 1024? I found a post that mentioned this is a
> possible bug. I cannot get IPFW to do anything with port 1645 or 1647 both
> are for radius. All other rules I have tried worked... 
> 
> thanks
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message