From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 15 16:25:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21EED16A4CE for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:25:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from grogged.dyndns.org (c-24-118-162-123.mn.client2.attbi.com [24.118.162.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0A143D2D for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:25:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@grogged.dyndns.org) Received: by grogged.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C3A3E212; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:22:36 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grogged.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C8C1EA; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:22:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:22:36 -0600 (CST) From: matt To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040215181937.A30161@grogged.dyndns.org> References: <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040215165913.M30161@grogged.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64 bit time_t oddness X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:25:10 -0000 Killing dhclient brought things back to normal - and yes, I did remove /var/db/dhcp.leases (had to, dhclient wouldn't work until I did). My kernel was just a run of the mill GENERIC, no changes. -m > > I am not seeing this behavior. My 64-bit time_t system is sitting > at 99% to 100% idle. One thing I notice is that you're running > dhclient there, and I am not. (I did do some testing with a DHCP > setup, but not much). Is your ethernet connection configured > correctly? Did you remember to remove /var/db/dhclient.leases ? > > I wonder if there's anything else that needs to be done for people > who are using DHCP. > > Do you have any interesting options turned on (or off) in your > kernel? My kernel == the GENERIC kernel, except that I have > commented out the WITNESS and WITNESS_SKIPSPIN options. I am > running the ULE scheduler (SCHED_ULE), which was a recent > change to the GENERIC kernel. Are you using the older scheduler? > > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu > Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu >