From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Apr 8 15:17:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91BA37B5BE for ; Sat, 8 Apr 2000 15:17:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk ([192.168.91.36] ident=exim) by scientia.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12e2nV-0009zF-00; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 22:29:41 +0100 Received: (from ben) by strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk (Exim 3.12 #7) id 12e2nV-000EqU-00; Sat, 08 Apr 2000 22:29:41 +0100 Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2000 22:29:41 +0100 From: Ben Smithurst To: Frederik Meerwaldt Subject: Re: Line Wrapping (Was: Re: Setting up a Webserver) Message-ID: <20000408222941.E87339@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <20000408135602.G4744@strontium.scientia.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Frederik Meerwaldt wrote: > But why wrap the lines? All programs do that automatically, I think. > I'm using pine for my mails, and it does this automatically. A similar thread has just happened on -stable, please let's not go there again. I'll just say two things, if you disagree please mail me and NOT the list. 1, what you say is not a safe assumption. 2, my mail window is 120 characters wide, so lines are wrapped at that width, and I find ~80 character lines much easier to read than 120 character ones. -- Ben Smithurst / ben@scientia.demon.co.uk / PGP: 0x99392F7D To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message