From owner-freebsd-current Sun Jul 20 15:42:05 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id PAA05966 for current-outgoing; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 15:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from abby.skypoint.net (abby.skypoint.net [199.86.32.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA05958 for ; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 15:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by abby.skypoint.net (8.8.5/alexis 2.7) with UUCP id RAA06447; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 17:40:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: (from bruce@localhost) by zuhause.mn.org (8.8.6/8.8.5) id PAA01046; Sun, 20 Jul 1997 15:37:55 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 15:37:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199707202037.PAA01046@zuhause.mn.org> From: Bruce Albrecht To: Narvi Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I am contemplating the following change... In-Reply-To: References: <199707191330.GAA18837@implode.root.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.30 under 19.15p2 XEmacs Lucid Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Narvi writes: > *Most* computers don't use the second com port unless they have a modem > in which case they usually don't have an ethernet card. So nobody even > notices. What about computers that have a serial mouse? I think this is a generalization that's not even close to true.