From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 10:55:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355CF16A4CF for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from catseye.mine.nu (d207-81-17-215.bchsia.telus.net [207.81.17.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCEBE43D45 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:55:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from catseye@catseye.mine.nu) Received: (qmail 23725 invoked by uid 1001); 17 Jan 2004 18:59:13 -0000 Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:59:13 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: zhangweiwu@realss.com Message-Id: <20040117105913.2e6725d8.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: weiwuzhang@hotmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: install 5.2 on Thinkpad T40 fxp problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 18:55:14 -0000 On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 02:22:32 +0800 "Zhang Weiwu" wrote: > Hello. I read some FreeBSD on Thinkpad T40 storis (prior to 5.2), these > guys have luckly have almost everything working! > > Now I just brought a new T40. The first problem is fxp0 autodetected and > always timeout: > fxp0: device timeout > fxp0 timeout on whatever network operation (ping, dhclient etc). > I'm sure the cable, the network and the connector is okay, only it is a > 10BaseT ethernet. > > #dmesg | grep fxp > fxp0: port 0x8000-0x803f mem > 0xc0201000-0xc0201fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci2 > fxp0: Ethernet address 00:0d:60:12:c3:61 > miibus0: on fxp0 > #ifconfig fxp0 > fxp0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > ether 00:0d:60:12:c3:61 > media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP) > status: active > > I noticed lots of other devices are using irq 11 too, don't know if it can > be a problem: > uhci1: irq 11 > uhci2: irq 11 > cbb0: irq 11 > cbb1: irq 11 > > Please give me a hint how to go on! Thank you. Maybe this page will help provide some insight? "resolving IRQ conflicts in FreeBSD on a ThinkPad A20m" http://www.paulbeard.org/movabletype/archives/000415.html -Chris