From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Mar 31 00:33:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ADCAE3CA9 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E20EC1A41; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u2V0Wuss050697 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:32:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u2V0WuqU050693; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:32:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:32:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Anton Shterenlikht cc: tijl@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Haswell composite desktop - laptop+HDMI monitor - how? In-Reply-To: <201603301230.u2UCU4kQ085063@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Message-ID: References: <201603301230.u2UCU4kQ085063@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 30 Mar 2016 18:32:57 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 00:33:00 -0000 On Wed, 30 Mar 2016, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Also, I'm confused by xrandr reporting only screen0. > Previously, with nvidia, I had in xorg.conf screen0 > and screen1 positioned to the right of screen0. > Perhaps xrandr uses a different terminology to xorg.conf? In the old days, there were separate screens for different monitors. That still happens, but rarely. Now there is only one screen. Both monitors are on that one screen. xrandr --auto puts both monitors at the same spot. If you want them to be side by side, displaying different parts of the same screen, use the xrandr options for right-of or left-of. An example is shown in the xrandr section. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html#x-config-monitors-xrandr The screen size is calculated from the size of the monitors. No other configuration in xorg.conf is needed unless the monitor EDID does not supply enough information, and that is vanishingly rare any more.