From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 01:20:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24106106566B for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 01:20:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sakura.ninth-nine.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:80a0:230:48ff:fe41:2455]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9C98FC12 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 01:20:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nadesico.ninth-nine.com (nadesico.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.122]) by sakura.ninth-nine.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/NinthNine) with SMTP id m4M1KXtA051142; Thu, 22 May 2008 10:20:35 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:20:32 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: pyunyh@gmail.com Message-Id: <20080522102032.45f11aa2.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20080520001312.GA29721@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080517231220.c64a992b.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080519071459.GA26209@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080519100523.GB26209@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080520025052.0efd7cd5.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080520001312.GA29721@cdnetworks.co.kr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.5.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.12.9; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (sakura.ninth-nine.com [219.127.74.121]); Thu, 22 May 2008 10:20:37 +0900 (JST) Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Cardbus GbE (Realtek 8169SBL) supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:20:39 -0000 Hi Pyun. On Tue, 20 May 2008 09:13:12 +0900 Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > re0: Chip rev. 0x10000000 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Hmm, this looks very weird. This revision indicates the hardware is > 8169SB/8110SB. The chip revision of your first mail was 0x7cc00000. Hum.... > > Please wait a while until next report:-). > Ok, let me know how it goes. There are some problems on PHY operations like following: 1. doesn't manual link up, offten. # ifconfig re0 up re0: PHY write failed re0: PHY write failed re0: PHY write failed re0: PHY write failed # (But 'status: no carrier' or no 'status:' line) 2. doesn't automatic link up on connected to L2SW, sometimes. # ifconfig re0 : staus: no carrier Sometimes, good works. Such as, RTL8169SBL communicated good. Overall, it is not stable.