Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 7 Apr 2017 16:27:43 +0200
From:      Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r437178 - in head/devel: . nlohmann-json
Message-ID:  <cb74d5fe-a35f-885b-727a-a88524cdca4e@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170407121422.0446db4c@bsd64.grem.de>
References:  <201703290028.v2T0SKrc069160@repo.freebsd.org> <747ebb65-5858-6d3c-3c1d-9966c16cd111@FreeBSD.org> <20170407121422.0446db4c@bsd64.grem.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--iqgWE1pUvJ6UvgRLIx6qtHuAwjSsawDw3
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="J1EhMFm9VRgiDaAGVH0f6MOULlDiNNUTG";
 protected-headers="v1"
From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org>
To: Michael Gmelin <grembo@freebsd.org>
Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <cb74d5fe-a35f-885b-727a-a88524cdca4e@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r437178 - in head/devel: . nlohmann-json
References: <201703290028.v2T0SKrc069160@repo.freebsd.org>
 <747ebb65-5858-6d3c-3c1d-9966c16cd111@FreeBSD.org>
 <20170407121422.0446db4c@bsd64.grem.de>
In-Reply-To: <20170407121422.0446db4c@bsd64.grem.de>

--J1EhMFm9VRgiDaAGVH0f6MOULlDiNNUTG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Le 07/04/2017 =C3=A0 12:14, Michael Gmelin a =C3=A9crit :
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 11:04:43 +0200
> Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
>
>> Le 29/03/2017 =C3=A0 02:28, Michael Gmelin a =C3=A9crit :
>>> +PORTNAME=3D	nlohmann-json =20
>> This should probably be PORTNAME=3Djson and a PKGNAMEPREFIX=3Dnlhomann=
-
>> later.
>>
>>> +PORTVERSION=3D	v2.1.1 =20
>> This is just wrong, this should be PORTVERSIOn=3D2.1.1 and
>> DISTVERSIONPREFIX=3Dv
>>
> Going through unread emails I missed, sorry for the late response. Both=

> changes make sense, I assume that I'll also need to bump PORTEPOCH to
> 1 though, since v2.1.1 > 2.1.1, right?


Why assume things, just ask pkg...

$ pkg version -t v2.1.1 2.1.1
<

--=20
Mathieu Arnold



--J1EhMFm9VRgiDaAGVH0f6MOULlDiNNUTG--

--iqgWE1pUvJ6UvgRLIx6qtHuAwjSsawDw3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=FYJj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--iqgWE1pUvJ6UvgRLIx6qtHuAwjSsawDw3--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb74d5fe-a35f-885b-727a-a88524cdca4e>