From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Nov 22 15:59:25 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA05261 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 15:59:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat) Received: from peeper.my.domain ([208.128.8.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA05256 for ; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 15:59:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@peeper.my.domain) Received: (from tom@localhost) by peeper.my.domain (8.8.8/8.7.3) id RAA14904; Sat, 22 Nov 1997 17:57:54 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <19971122175754.27028@my.domain> Date: Sat, 22 Nov 1997 17:57:54 -0600 From: Tom Jackson To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RC5/64 source References: <19971121091909.57156@right.PCS> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: ; from Steve Price on Fri, Nov 21, 1997 at 10:44:59AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, Nov 21, 1997 at 10:44:59AM -0600, Steve Price wrote: > > > On Fri, 21 Nov 1997, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > # It doesn't appear to be publically available. From the little I've > # gleaned from the RC5 lists, it appears that they are concerned that > # someone will falsely report a keyblock as completed, without actually > # doing the work. > # > > Darn. I requested that my father-in-law who works at a fairly large > company here in town (2nd or 3rd largest I believe) to contribute to > the cause and he said that he had reservations about it because in his > words, "How do I know it is not stealing all of my data while it > generates keys?". I thought if I could get the source... > > # I believe this is supposed to be addressed in the upcoming `V3' client. > # > # Team FreeBSD is now at #28, btw. > > Team FreeBSD broke into the top 30 on the same day that I turned 30. :) > > Steve > > # -- > # Jonathan > # > If you'all will check earlier on this mailing list, with a subject of *OS/2*, you will find the client source at www.distributed.net/rc5/. Tom