From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 11 12:23:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0616214C1C7 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from gilb.zs64.net (gilb.zs64.net [212.12.50.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "gilb.zs64.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46qRtw010fz4SvK for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:23:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: by gilb.zs64.net (Postfix, from stb@lassitu.de) id D122429D329 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:23:16 +0000 (UTC) From: Stefan Bethke Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Is IPV6 option still necessary? Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 14:22:50 +0200 References: <20191007.151841.1094708479149685365.yasu@utahime.org> <9b8c9b1b-0d26-d9d7-018a-cafa8ec98c1e@abinet.ru> <20191009061538.re66hcii2z73ry6p@ivaldir.net> To: FreeBSD Ports In-Reply-To: <20191009061538.re66hcii2z73ry6p@ivaldir.net> Message-Id: <7CCD6F03-062C-4A4F-AE05-DDF0EE13B291@lassitu.de> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46qRtw010fz4SvK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of stb@lassitu.de designates 212.12.50.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=stb@lassitu.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.922,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[lassitu.de]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[234.50.12.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.05)[asn: 13135(-0.22), country: DE(-0.01)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:13135, ipnet:212.12.48.0/21, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:23:21 -0000 Am 09.10.2019 um 08:15 schrieb Baptiste Daroussin : >=20 > I agree I don't see the reason why we should keep that ipv6 option. = When off > this option does not bring much value to the users as the code for = apps to > support ipv6 mostly reside in the libc. Actually that was my intent in = 2012 to > first turn it on by default everywhere and then drop the option = entirely. Is there an easy way to tell which ports pay attention to the option? Stefan --=20 Stefan Bethke Fon +49 151 14070811