Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 01:59:13 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile Message-ID: <4EEF0AF1.20501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201112181751.pBIHpivv027591@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201112181751.pBIHpivv027591@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks, that's 1/3 of the job done. :) The problem is that the current OPTION creates the false idea that the only way you can lock your screen is to use xlockmore. Perhaps you missed my followup where I mentioned that the next step would be to add an OPTION for xscreensaver as well, and the logic to avoid having them both defined. Better yet would be to detect if one or the other is already installed, and default the OPTIONS accordingly. Doug On 12/18/2011 09:51, Chris Rees wrote: > crees 2011-12-18 17:51:44 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > sysutils/xfce4-utils Makefile > Log: > - Make xlockmore dependency optional > - Use bsd.port.options.mk > > PR: ports/163434 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=163434 > Submitted by: Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com>, dougb > > Revision Changes Path > 1.59 +9 -6 ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makefile > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/xfce4-utils/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.58&r2=1.59&f=h > -- [^L] Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EEF0AF1.20501>