From nobody Mon Aug 23 20:37:50 2021 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED65177B8F4 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GtkZk4Vb5z4Xhm for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8397A1AED4 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 17NKboDg051728 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:37:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 17NKboUt051727 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:37:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 257991] devel/p5-Params-Coerce: Update to 0.15 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:37:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: svysh.fbsd@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D257991 --- Comment #4 from Sergei Vyshenski --- (In reply to Nuno Teixeira from comment #3) Nuno, Thank you for your concern. Let me clarify.=20 Maybe here we have an example of a bigger problem. I do not have a goal to collect unattended ports. I am just concerned about updating dependencies for my main port=20 security/p5-openxpki. It has many hundreds of dependencies=20 (if you count test_dependecies, there are around a thousand of them). And often it is essential that these dependencies be up to date -- for correct work of the named port. Some maintainers of these dependencies have been not seen=20 in the FreeBSD project for 10-15 years. Often when I try to update a such, I takes months. With time patches turn obsolete, I have to recreate them. IMHO this practice is strange and even humiliating. And maybe it is worth reconsidering. Regards, Sergei --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=