Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:58:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Per Christian Henden <perchrh@stud.math.ntnu.no> To: openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: OpenOffice in ports: usage of /proc/ Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0210251645490.6607-100000@mona.math.ntnu.no> In-Reply-To: <20021013165529.W15308-100000@levais.imp.ch>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I'm using a FreeBSD system with no /proc filesystem, and because of this (I think) openoffice from ports segfaults. ktrace /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.0/setup and kdump reveals: 6587 setup.bin CALL getpid 6587 setup.bin RET getpid 6587/0x19bb 6587 setup.bin CALL open(0xbfbfd400,0,0) 6587 setup.bin NAMI "/proc/6587/cmdline" 6587 setup.bin RET open -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 6587 setup.bin CALL getpid 6587 setup.bin RET getpid 6587/0x19bb 6587 setup.bin CALL open(0xbfbfe080,0,0) 6587 setup.bin NAMI "/proc/6587/cmdline" 6587 setup.bin RET open -1 errno 2 No such file or directory 6587 setup.bin PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL 6587 setup.bin NAMI "core" The patch patch-sal+osl+unx+system.h in (todays) ports-stable and ports-current editors/openoffice/files/ contains the line +# define CMD_ARG_PROC_NAME "/proc/%u/cmdline" This is the reason for the segfault as far as I can see. Is it possible to do without the use of /proc? If not there should be a check to see if /proc is mounted/is enabled in the kernel/has some files inside of it before the program assumes it is. I should fix this myself, I know, but I don't know C/C++ :( -- Per Christian Henden, perchrh@stud.ntnu.no --------------------- Why don't elephants eat penguins ? Because they can't get the wrappers off ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-openoffice" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.44.0210251645490.6607-100000>