From owner-freebsd-www@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 15:40:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-www@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004EF37B401 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 15:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (pc1-cdif2-5-cust38.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.101.150.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40B743F75 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 15:40:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.12) id 19BMih-0008Dp-00; Thu, 01 May 2003 23:40:03 +0100 Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 23:40:03 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: David Wolfskill Message-ID: <20030501224003.GD30996@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , David Wolfskill , www@freebsd.org References: <20030430172501.1798C2A7EA@canning.wemm.org> <200305011513.h41FDNmw017479@bunrab.catwhisker.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305011513.h41FDNmw017479@bunrab.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: www@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subscriptions to/for freebsd-ww@freebsd.org list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Project Webmasters List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 22:40:06 -0000 On Thu, May 01, 2003 at 08:13:23AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > >To: David Wolfskill > >Cc: admin@FreeBSD.ORG > >Subject: Re: Subscriptions to/for freebsd-ww@freebsd.org list? > >Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:25:01 -0700 > >From: Peter Wemm > > >David Wolfskill wrote: > >> We have 3 pending subscriptions for the freebsd-www@freebsd.org list > >> so far. > > >> What are the criteria for accepting or rejecting such requests? > > >> I'm willing to take care of them, once I understand the application of > >> an answer to that question. > > >... > > >Its probably best to ask the www/doc folks what the arrangement is supposed > >to be. > > OK, www@ folks: what is your pleasure on this? I was under the impression (until seanc told me otherwise about 4 weeks ago, as he was trying to subscribe) that www was an open list anyway. Do you know who was looking after this before the move to mailman ? Also, are current subscribers to the freebsd-www@ list committers (or similar) only? If not, I can't see any reason not to open the list to all subscribers, but really we need to establish who has been approving subscription requests all this time and ask them what grounds they were basing approval and denial on. Ceri --