From nobody Sun Sep 29 14:13:01 2024 X-Original-To: current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4XGmQL3PwNz5XjrL for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garyj@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "Telekom Security ServerID OV Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XGmQJ3xQqz4ZGH for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garyj@gmx.de) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmx.de header.s=s31663417 header.b=mxWeM4Qk; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of garyj@gmx.de designates 212.227.15.15 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=garyj@gmx.de; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=gmx.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1727619205; x=1728224005; i=garyj@gmx.de; bh=SLY9wJ3NNlPRod61hHPQUcOtKl5Jep8ZVgiQgFq99NY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=mxWeM4Qkm/seScYeuW/1HZnPB9cwxyzfQ83yQt2yFCiOhxzKpMgRhrB2I5w2QqPp DyWHs5oRfRaYvCG4Bgewxpaoyz8yjou1AKjrXZ+RFDPfJLmlCsaEtKar+pKHlJfH7 cv472fmoWLjLjX17tZRUehJooqyCR4L/QlQrYLmh/7z8yxNNT4e+irZ9NJUW/5Zw1 Nwb8Ud8s+wC8jM8osymLdEpRmwSTgT+mEZkWGT8eGW0ZnxfVQiLfkgVsX++DbVIjy NjEryqA2ro3x3SBivQos2iq6vOzUNZxaoDJI/XpX+01xjUeAQ4LVFW1AToeC5vTPk wigyvYvzNXV26MoypQ== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Received: from ernst.home ([217.226.54.45]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx005 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MG9kM-1sgbsX1BCm-00CnZi for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:13:25 +0200 Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 14:13:01 +0000 From: Gary Jennejohn To: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Is INET6 a required option these days? (kernel build failure) Message-ID: <20240929161301.2cea8a36@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: <01A54634-1A79-4B52-96C4-88253725910C@freebsd.org> References: <4E5CBF78-A9AC-4D1C-9D81-CB379C408468@FreeBSD.org> <01A54634-1A79-4B52-96C4-88253725910C@freebsd.org> Reply-To: garyj@gmx.de X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.19.1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:mAvH56wXVSztYztpqkj0wq73NZ8RjIULKNLNZMYXn6AMhHz6fO0 MbxTG6QcswfmL/8FN20lGx2pvjgwsk2h/LEEpllDyQK12zHqIT8iikMei3X11hyOrDz/VaK B+dy+s+UlQtc8b4QQd9Gp5rqMqXSNI62bE7CyE35Hn/OSdwW+BO7zClJxQUlW5XUHgisI5B stpy57UFZbAvKpCp3MoCQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:Lre4f4B8BOQ=;2tUyPpzRj5b6C43iWEdTDOFP2oN caR2TqsmvqnbGHDSKikKXHQUDxyD/n7wxs92wF2j0u1R2RffM91AQvMT6GXVFUuPbfxoNdBJB Hyhye/K2sB2GigtYTS58LZ46JfmZsNK6xL9Bc5Tz+u9f/pXYupacPNa2hJXwYp+SqmesP5huN qLW3kVh9gbze7oxCM1/hK1J9e8whAdDAVyGeuV3/mgnXHE8JdT8mhsXAlv0nN8f/ni2JCBb1F FtSR4cH6vLCbDyyVhENtPvzkOQf6BmmN2s00Ftx6t+Q07BV7+89Q8s3Ka1LovDm3/srNAicsm fmcd8aojqDxF0+ECl0KUS1cf+MyGqHgjlSQqBti54fNNLWtWPGWFaQSRLlGr3OlXhlfdMDZ0O jGuFKg+GGVY8LRTE2DXrJi9lThQbjBvtX7yLGTXerRHnnJZEX/b1MZ84YQX+2Wffhfl+v1dQd ljpynaxUpElLpaCz+XLh4QpKCfrubsRrW0YGBN/fsT2L6U+G+lMq8W648R8+MQsFeHoh3v9gY G0tCoacHzy253Tt9pmY2crZ8UpXALsBoDe+npgqXa1wciFYhk60EtQ/mTyQhBh9VXi/2SmtCn 3tKmfapYAoIMZTDuUII3dxA6pbACyNsoM48d1hQ5uRWX2QxiDBsMdmmB/Bz2joeqam8Dsf3Af tSfyU5dqDel0IoKuCcDTQwztiZ9v69NzvesJedr5DImRVxFgPDzVBnYRSz++ONTZduj5o4Ypq tk633fKzP89wV2nA7HcGPVWkMxIZani4AJcbT3Y0DcAhCtebybmdVJ4K4XiaI87cqX1osWeOx V971nHP30gIROuZiLmZYeEtA== X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.42 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.93)[0.930]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.74)[0.740]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmx.de,quarantine]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmx.de:s=s31663417]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:mout.gmx.net]; ONCE_RECEIVED(0.10)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[212.227.15.15:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(-0.10)[212.227.15.15:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmx.de]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.de]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmx.de:+]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[garyj@gmx.de]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[current@freebsd.org]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4XGmQJ3xQqz4ZGH X-Spamd-Bar: / On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 11:53:10 +0200 Kristof Provost wrote: > > On 29 Sep 2024, at 04:46, Zhenlei Huang wrote: > > > > ? > > > >> On Sep 27, 2024, at 6:07 PM, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2024 14:58:40 -0400 > >>> Ian FREISLICH wrote: > >>> > >>> Lately there have been a couple of commits that fail to build becaus= e v6 being compiled in despite INET6 being undefined. I think the latest i= s 905db4aa88775865097714c170f4503da385747c. > >>> > >>> /usr/src/sys/netpfil/pf/pf.c:8762:38: error: no member named 'icmp6'= in 'union pf_headers'; did you mean 'icmp'? > >>> 8762 | if (!pf_pull_hdr(m, *off, &pd->hdr.icmp6, icm= p_hlen, > >>> > >>> Ian > >>> > >> > >> This happens now and then because most committers have INET6 enabled = and > >> they forget that INET6 is an option and not mandatory. > > > > Kristof is landing lots of commits from upstream ( OpenBSD ), so we ne= ed be patient with him ... > > > There may have been intermittent breakage, although I always try to avoi= d that, but main currently just works. > > >> > >> I don't have INET6 enabled and have reported a number of problems in = the > >> source as a result of that. > > I strongly advise against running non-default configurations. They're al= ways less tested (and thus more buggy) and harder to support. > > Only do so if there?s genuinely no alternative. > I personally have been using a customized kernel configuration file for 25 years or more and I have no intention of changing it. Just because INET6 shows up in all the boilerplate config files doesn't change the fact that INET6 is still an option. =2D- Gary Jennejohn