From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Apr 17 22:19:47 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA03658
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 22:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from macro.stanford.edu (macro.Stanford.EDU [36.59.0.131])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA03653
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 22:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from skippy@localhost) by macro.stanford.edu (8.8.2/8.7.1) id WAA26846; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 22:19:43 -0700
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 22:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Studenmund <skippy@macro.stanford.edu>
Reply-To: Bill Studenmund <skippy@macro.stanford.edu>
To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu>
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Netatalk1.4b1 speed patches
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.970417233624.6598F-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.A32.3.95.970417221824.25034B-100000@macro.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, John Fieber wrote:

> On Thu, 17 Apr 1997, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> The only speed-up patches I was ever aware of (and used) were for
> older versions of netatalk.  That may be the confusion.

Could be. It was before 1.4 came out.

Take care,

Bill