Date: Tue, 19 Sep 1995 12:02:39 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Policy on printf format specifiers? Message-ID: <199509191902.MAA10393@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199509191327.IAA27985@bonkers.taronga.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Sep 19, 95 08:27:13 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In article <6760.811430864@critter.tfs.com>, > Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> wrote: > >> >I'd like to add a format specifier '%S' to the list of format specifiers > >> >accepted by printf. Well, kernel printf, anyway. > >> I don't want wchar_t's in the kernel. > >I also fail to see the need for this, and even if I did see the need, I > >still think we shouldn't have them in the kernel... > > Does namei() handle UTF filenames correctly? If you consider reducing the MAXPATHNAME by one for every expansion, then yes, I suppose it does. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199509191902.MAA10393>