Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Oct 2014 12:02:36 -0500
From:      Jim Riggs <freebsd-lists@christianserving.org>
To:        freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, hrs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [CFT] multiple instance support in rc.d script
Message-ID:  <685F1351-19A9-47F8-8119-AD6FAE903B10@christianserving.org>
In-Reply-To: <20141017.102259.2303779237508789020.hrs@allbsd.org>
References:  <20141017.102259.2303779237508789020.hrs@allbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16 Oct 2014, at 20:22, Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> I would like your feedback and testers of the attached patch.  This
> implements multiple instance support in rc.d scripts.  You can try it
> by replacing /etc/rc.subr with the attached one.


I really like the idea, as I have written at least 2 or 3 ports in which =
I have needed support for multiple "profiles" (as I have seen them =
called in several ports). So, I had to duplicate the multiple-instance =
logic in the rc script for each. This would save all of that =
aggravation.

The only concern I have with generalizing the approach in rc.subr, =
though, is that not every app/daemon/script can or should support it. I =
worry that some things if run multiple times may stomp on each other or =
corrupt data or break something. It seems that there should be a way for =
each rc script to either opt in or opt out of multiple instance support. =
I don't know which is better. Opt-in is probably safer, but then core =
devs and port maintainers have to make specific changes to support it. =
:-\

Thoughts?




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?685F1351-19A9-47F8-8119-AD6FAE903B10>