From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 3 22:01:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46D056AD; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (heidi.turbocat.net [88.198.202.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DE99BC; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 22:01:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop015.home.selasky.org (cm-176.74.213.204.customer.telag.net [176.74.213.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4F921FE022; Sat, 4 Apr 2015 00:01:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <551F0DF0.5010703@selasky.org> Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2015 00:02:24 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gleb Smirnoff Subject: Re: Patch to reduce use of global IP ID value(s) to avoid leaking information References: <551F034A.3040402@selasky.org> <20150403213641.GM64665@glebius.int.ru> In-Reply-To: <20150403213641.GM64665@glebius.int.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Robert N. M. Watson" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 22:01:45 -0000 On 04/03/15 23:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > If you don't agree with me, let's ask opinion of Mike Silbersack, the author > of the random IP ID code. What does he things on manual page diff? Hi Gleb, Feel free to modify or update that text. Sure we could ask Mike Silbersack for advice about this one. > P.S. Let me notice again, that you give 1 hour and 40 minutes for review. > Why so impatient? The paragraph was sitting there without modification for > a decade. Can it wait for at least a day? Let's talk this over at the coming BSD conference(s) face to face. I'm fine using "hps_head" for committing stuff that is not directly USB related. --HPS