From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 23 19:01:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A782D3 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com (mail-pd0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E94225BD for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:01:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id z10so1620828pdj.17 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:01:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=oT7k4LNNxRYRgPqN6RSlKe7TeRYiopUg82PO8o4WPHc=; b=uZPAROHJoZkK6wfKOI62x3Z6t0iEPBg8wSVzOuNmYH7sxYKHn6/OCN8qa/U6sI+deI Sb8SpwwhJRRgzX3ibGk1v+pp7gA4NmHXEa1Ndrs+RYaalboVudFr92S7cFfhOlMDnvW2 kKyQpH6v15aXmHd7tK+x0XDb4PdjeyDfwzOuuTmzuVvQ0iOPujmxEc4HGl9zv07lgY4v 9Ir9UT5nCiwPChDGY23y6RYXlcBkOXJxU6YFmPvzYumGQuzIPVGJO5sQdvpY9GqUOrPY 8PHKHxC1OLNuTCeYSc1dYmxoLdKQkeNwgKA8ucJnwPgFh0Ths5jsvD4Tic4Tkm9TTYfv 3JSA== X-Received: by 10.68.195.138 with SMTP id ie10mr3161019pbc.196.1382554866489; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fy4sm6216277pbb.1.2013.10.23.12.01.05 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: FreeBSD, Centos and ZFS - SOLVED Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 12:01:04 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <897771F2-AACE-44A7-8072-94A75327650E@gmail.com> References: <1381600575.18393.33219025.5D7B78D0@webmail.messagingengine.com> <8CA809B3-1692-4760-A63F-9D7451EB49BD@gmail.com> <525D143B.50202@gmail.com> <1382285088.2462.36238881.1AA6BB17@webmail.messagingengine.com> <25C055B9-4A19-46C8-B78E-AC8BD6E00CD9@gmail.com> To: nightrecon@hotmail.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 19:01:07 -0000 On Oct 22, 2013, at 11:17 PM, Michael Powell wrote: > aurfalien wrote: > >> On Oct 22, 2013, at 7:55 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> >>> Well, the 30% diff in performance due to those two intel CPU options >>> means that somehow the scheduler and power management stuff in FreeBSD >>> isn't playing with turbo boost / speedstep. >>> >>> So yeah, figuring out why would be nice. >> >> Ditto. >> >> I never enabled powerd in FreeBSD9 or 10. Unsure what the default >> position is. >> >> In CentOS, I usually just set a diff BIOS feature as disabled or >> performance depending on what the options are. >> >> On this server, it had acoustic/performance/balance as well as well as >> that CPU option which threw me off. >> >> - aurf >> >> > > You might find this interesting: > > http://www.ateamsystems.com/blog/Increase-FreeBSD-Performance-With-powerd Bingo. Many thanks. - aurf