From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Dec 18 16:15:05 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6881065673;
	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl)
Received: from mx0.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2a01:4f8:101:5343::aa])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E590D8FC14;
	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:15:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mx0.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CEE6A2A28CD0; Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:15:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 17:15:03 +0100
From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
To: Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>
Message-ID: <20111218161503.GG1771@hoeg.nl>
References: <20111216214913.GA1771@hoeg.nl>
	<20111216220914.GW50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20111216221959.GB1771@hoeg.nl>
	<20111216223126.GX50300@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<20111218132742.GA52983@stack.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vhOf6eAHdfH9MSjZ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20111218132742.GA52983@stack.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, threads@freebsd.org,
	arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] C1X threading support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2011 16:15:05 -0000


--vhOf6eAHdfH9MSjZ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Jilles,

* Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@stack.nl>, 20111218 14:27:
> Another idea is to implement the functions as static inline (with the
> possible exception of thrd_create() and perhaps some more). This
> pollutes the namespace of C1x programs with pthread_* though.

Hmmm... Indeed. This would change the entire C1X threading API simply
into a compile-time translation mechanism to pthreads. Unfortunately, it
would make things like debugging a bit harder, as placing breakpoints on
the functions become a bit harder.

Are there any objections to such an approach?

--=20
 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

--vhOf6eAHdfH9MSjZ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD)
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=lmo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vhOf6eAHdfH9MSjZ--