From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Aug 31  3:50: 9 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F17437B400
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 03:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AC343E42
	for <freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 03:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id g7VAo4JU077130
	for <freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org>; Sat, 31 Aug 2002 03:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.4/8.12.4/Submit) id g7VAo4kY077129;
	Sat, 31 Aug 2002 03:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 03:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200208311050.g7VAo4kY077129@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer)
Subject: Re: ports/35580: Starup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
	is invoked in undesirable order.
Reply-To: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR ports/35580; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer)
To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/35580: Starup script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
	is invoked in undesirable order.
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 12:37:47 +0200

 Shigio Yamaguchi wrote
 
 >  > so which ssh port would you like me to tie this to, there are currently 
 >  > 3 ssh ports in the tree?
 >  
 >  I think all sshs should be changed because all of them should be invoked
 >  before other services.
 
 I object, the order is highly dependend.
 I use fore example:
 
 1) postgress
 2) bind9 + with sql
 3) sshd
 
 User must rename the "*.sample" script anyway to activate it.
 
 kind regards Dirk
 
 - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany
 - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message