From owner-freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 17 18:36:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD3616A4CE; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:36:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E2D43D5F; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:36:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (acs-24-154-239-170.zoominternet.net [24.154.239.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i7HIa10l076138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:36:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 14:36:36 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" Message-Id: <20040817143636.59bcabe0@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040817182512.GA46244@madman.celabo.org> References: <20040817122453.05edaaea@localhost> <56FC3488-F075-11D8-924A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> <20040817175847.GC43426@madman.celabo.org> <20040817140521.1d0f252d@localhost> <20040817182512.GA46244@madman.celabo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-vuxml@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/portaudit-db/database portaudit.txt portaudit.xlist portaudit.xml X-BeenThere: freebsd-vuxml@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documenting security issues in VuXML List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 18:36:03 -0000 On Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:25:12 -0500 "Jacques A. Vidrine" wrote: [SNIP] > Thank you, I'm braindead lately. We don't need another element or > anything, we can just use a fixed string instead of a date string. I > prefer > > unspecified > > but the others (in lower case) might be OK, also. But let's just pick > one. > > I'll have to check if this breaks anything existing, but I feel it will > be easy to accomodate. I like unknown over unspecified. Unspecified makes me think that a discovery date was never released by the developers while unknown just means that we don't know or can't prove it. -- Tom Rhodes