From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jun 14 05:03:18 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FAF37B401
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:03:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.munk.nu (213-152-51-194.dsl.eclipse.net.uk
	[213.152.51.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AE143F75
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:03:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from munk@mail.munk.nu)
Received: from munk by mail.munk.nu with local (Exim 4.20)
	id 19R9ka-000DwW-1s
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 13:03:16 +0100
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 13:03:16 +0100
From: Jez Hancock <jez.hancock@munk.nu>
To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20030614120316.GC50426@users.munk.nu>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
References: <20030614105834.GB504@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030614105834.GB504@freepuppy.bellavista.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: User Munk <munk@mail.munk.nu>
Subject: Re: unexpected soft update inconsistency
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 12:03:18 -0000

On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 12:58:34PM +0200, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> The filesystem is always ok during the normal boot-time fsck run, so I'm
> wondering whether this is normal, or if the fs is screwed. Attached is
> the output of fsck(8) run in multiuser (postfix was running).
> 
> roman@freepuppy ~ 1005:0 > df -h
> Filesystem    Size   Used  Avail Capacity  Mounted on
> /dev/ad0s1a   504M    49M   415M    10%    /
> /dev/ad0s1e    72G    36G    30G    55%    /usr
> procfs        4.0K   4.0K     0B   100%    /proc
> roman@freepuppy ~ 1006:0 > ls -l /var
> lrwxr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  8 Sep 16  2002 /var -> /usr/var

What happens if you turn off soft updates on those mounts?