From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Mar 26 08:48:00 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA22632
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 26 Mar 1997 08:48:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mpp@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA22621;
          Wed, 26 Mar 1997 08:47:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Mike Pritchard <mpp>
Message-Id: <199703261647.IAA22621@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: dumpfs patch for review
To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 08:47:52 -0800 (PST)
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199703260551.WAA01493@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Mar 25, 97 10:51:53 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Nate Williams wrote:
> 
> It's not pretty, and I'm not sure how to 'correctly' printout the value
> of the new fs_id line, but since no-one else appears to be doing
> anything about it here's my attempt at fixing the broken tree.
> 
> If no one objects I'll commit this tomorrow after enough people have
> time to review it.

fs_id[0] is a time_t value, and probably should be printed as such.
         is it the time that the file system was "randomized", either
	 by newfs or fsirand.
fd_id[1] is a random number
--
Mike Pritchard
mpp@FreeBSD.org
"Go that way.  Really fast.  If something gets in your way, turn"