From owner-freebsd-current Wed Jan 7 14:01:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id OAA16224 for current-outgoing; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 14:01:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA16198; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 14:00:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA00170; Wed, 7 Jan 1998 13:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(), claiming to be "current1.whistle.com" via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd000167; Wed Jan 7 13:56:46 1998 Message-ID: <34B3F969.2781E494@whistle.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 1998 13:53:45 -0800 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: shimon@simon-shapiro.org CC: Julian Elischer , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DEVFS-11 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Simon Shapiro wrote: > > On 07-Jan-98 Julian Elischer wrote: > > One little change and a fix > > > > change.. > > You can now newfs /dev/rsd0 and mount it (/dev/sd0) without ever > > disklabelling it. (its just a pile of blocks, why not have a FS on it?) > > This is a byproduct of the fact that all slices appear identical, > > whether or not they are subslices of subslices of subslices, or just a > > whole raw disk. More interesting is the capacity to newfs and mount an > > MBR slice (e.g. wd0s2) without going to the extra step of adding the > > disklabel. Of course you need to disklabel to make a BOOTABLE part. :) > > > > This is "Even more dangeroulsy dedicated mode" > > It is more useful for the floppy where you can now do: > > newfs /dev/rfd0 floppy3 > > > > Without the disklabel step. and still mount it. > > This wan't the AIM but it's a byproduct of the aim of making all > > disk abstractions identical. > > > > > > fix: > > Can now mount filesystems from floppies again without crashing the > > system. > > (Thanks to Mike Smith for falling into that pit..) > > > > julian > > > > This may be the version that gets checked in (Branch JULIAN_SLICES). > > Does it have to be a separate branch? It appears to these novice eyes > that if one does not add the SLICE option to the config file, the code is > pretty much out. So is the DEVFS option. So, if one does not like this > code, one can leave the option out of their kernel. > > Besides, from what I see, it works just as well as without the devfs, plus > all the benefits of a functional devfs. It has been so decreed that it shall pass a period of time with a separate branch.. Not my decision. > > ---------- > > Sincerely Yours, > > Simon Shapiro > Shimon@Simon-Shapiro.ORG Voice: 503.799.2313