Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 16:43:37 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 251103] net-mgmt/net-snmp: memory patch lost after 5.7 to 5.9 upgrade Message-ID: <bug-251103-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D251103 Bug ID: 251103 Summary: net-mgmt/net-snmp: memory patch lost after 5.7 to 5.9 upgrade Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: zi@FreeBSD.org Reporter: ncrogers@gmail.com Assignee: zi@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(zi@FreeBSD.org) Created attachment 219637 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D219637&action= =3Dedit Add back patch-agent_mibgroup_hardware_memory_memory__freebsd.c. In the upgrade from 5.7.3 to 5.9, the following MIB patch was removed: patch-agent_mibgroup_hardware_memory_memory__freebsd.c. This patch is, unfortunately, still necessary to correctly instrument "used" and "free" memory via SNMP under FreeBSD, since "inactive" memory needs to = be reported along with "cache" in the "UCD-SNMP-MIB::memCached" OID. This chan= ge was never upstreamed to net-snmp. This issue is a repeat of the old PR: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D148339 I've attached a patch that includes the old patch, which still applies clea= nly. As an aside, I'm not sure if "Laundry" memory needs to be reported in this = MIB or not as well? Can someone with more insight comment on this? Currently I = am using (memTotalReal - memAvailReal - memCached) to instrument "used" memory= via SNMP. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-251103-7788>