From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jan 16 7:11:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from thalvors.miralink.com (sub19-210.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.19.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175C937B69C; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:11:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by thalvors.miralink.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 9B0F7BB83F; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thalvors.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D8C4405C; Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:10:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 07:10:40 -0800 (PST) From: Tracy Camp To: mjacob@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/21139: IBM DNES drives need 'quirk table' entry. In-Reply-To: <200101160755.f0G7t1I03529@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 15 Jan 2001 mjacob@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: IBM DNES drives need 'quirk table' entry. > > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback > State-Changed-By: mjacob > State-Changed-When: Mon Jan 15 23:53:28 PST 2001 > State-Changed-Why: > Are any of these drives still around and/or is this a problem? It was the opinion from some of the developers (I forget who) that these drives where problably okay. I'm somewhat inclined to believe them, however I can attest that they have problems when coupled with adaptec2940UW controllers (haven't tried anything else...) so the problem may actually lie with the adaptec controller? Anyways somewhere or another on my particular combination of hardware the tagged queue size was not being set properly and the quirk entry fixed this. t. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=21139 > Tracy Camp Product Development Miralink Corp.PDX Portland OR 503-223-3140 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message