From owner-freebsd-bugs Tue Jun 8 4:20:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95D214EDB for ; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 04:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id EAA31071; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 04:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 04:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199906081120.EAA31071@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: bin/11960: inetd built in wrapping doesn't log like tcpd does. Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/11960; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: David Malone Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/11960: inetd built in wrapping doesn't log like tcpd does. Date: Tue, 08 Jun 1999 13:16:48 +0200 On Tue, 08 Jun 1999 11:41:01 +0100, David Malone wrote: > Yup - we should call syslog for every connection with allow_severity for > the level. For a start this is what tcpd does, but for a second > allow_severity can be changed by the call to hosts_access But that's just my point. I don't think it can, certainly not from my take on the allow_severity variable in inetd.c ... Where are you looking? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message