From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 22 13:55:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B3116A41F for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:55:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7178643D45 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:55:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEAA61CA; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2547660F1; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7AFD233D44; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:55:00 +0200 (CEST) To: Kris Kennaway References: <20050821084546.GA77111@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20050821175406.GA36164@xor.obsecurity.org> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:55:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20050821175406.GA36164@xor.obsecurity.org> (Kris Kennaway's message of "Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:54:06 -0400") Message-ID: <868xyu3wln.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Tests: ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Learn: ham X-Spam-Score: -5.2/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on tim.des.no Cc: Divacky Roman , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: fdalloc optimization X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:55:07 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 10:45:46AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > I made a patch for fdalloc which could speed it up a bit, its stored un= der > > kern/85176 or http://hysteria.sk/~neologism/kern_descrip.patch > That's all nice and everything, but *does* it speed it up a bit? :-) It won't make a measurable difference, but that doesn't mean the patch is wrong. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no