From owner-freebsd-security  Sat Jun 22 10:52:38 1996
Return-Path: owner-security
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA23174
          for security-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from post.io.org (post.io.org [198.133.36.6])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA23169;
          Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:52:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zap.io.org (taob@zap.io.org [198.133.36.81]) by post.io.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA26264; Sat, 22 Jun 1996 13:49:42 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 13:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org>
To: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
cc: FREEBSD-SECURITY-L <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: IPFW vs. IP Filter? 
In-Reply-To: <19361.835464418@palmer.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960622134742.9476F-100000@zap.io.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 22 Jun 1996, Gary Palmer wrote:
>
> I thought Alex Nash recently updated both? Have you tried our WWW
> pages to get the latest version?

    Nope, not AFAIK.  I'm checking my local copy of the Web site
(http://www.io.org/freebsd/), which is mirrored from wcarchive's
/pub/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/www/data directory every night.  The man
page in -current's ipfw is dated Feb 24, 1996 (which is what my
2.2-SNAP machines say).  The default /etc/rc.firewalls script needs
updating too.
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net)
Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"