Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 02 Jan 2000 14:26:13 -0800
From:      R Joseph Wright <rjoseph@nwlink.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: some performance issues
Message-ID:  <386FD085.93BFA305@nwlink.com>
References:  <386C0676.F39EC477@3-cities.com> <386C2354.ABD1ED54@nwlink.com> <386C3173.1D695393@3-cities.com> <386C543D.6E59C9DF@nwlink.com> <19991231104441.C2609@emu.sourcee.com> <386CE8AB.29A140B5@nwlink.com> <386CF9DC.B71A9887@3-cities.com> <386D3D3C.C92D02A3@nwlink.com> <386D5C88.B8257D45@3-cities.com> <386D8ABD.C2894A91@nwlink.com> <20000101160159.O1528@freebie.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Greg Lehey wrote:

> iozone is not really a storage device testing program.  Use rawio (in
> the Ports Collection) for that: it bypasses the cache.  Read carefully
> the warnings which tell you that you should not use the write tests on
> a file system which contains data you want to keep.
> 
> > Kent, I tried that, only for me it worked doing "iozone 160".  Here is
> > my results:
> >
> > 11483869 bytes/second for reading
> > 15155142 bytes/second for writing
> 
> This is sequential access.  You'll never get that in practice.
> 
> > Is that really slow?  It's nowhere near 33MB/second.
> 
> 33 MB/s is the transfer rate from disk buffer to CPU.  The transfer
> rate off the platter is slower, and your speeds there look pretty
> good.  But remember that they're the ideal case.
> 
> > I have a Maxtor 7000rpm with UDMA66 capabilities, although I'll have
> > to wait for -STABLE to support that, and a new motherboard as well.
> > I may recompile with the old flags just to see the difference.
> 
> I'd be interested to see the difference, but I don't think it'll be
> very much.  Try both with rawio, and look at the random access
> results, which are the only ones that count in practice.
> 
> Greg

I tried rawio, and got the following using flags 0xb0ffb0ff:

	Random Read			Random Write
ID      K/sec     /sec			K/sec     /sec
anon    25352.3   1560			16548.4   1024

With flags set at 0x80ff80ff, I got:

	K/sec     /sec
        12992.0   806
After that, it core dumped.  But I got double the speed with the new
flags! I was pretty amazed.  I did the test on an empty partition, so as
not to disturb anything.

BTW, your book The Complete FreeBSD has been tremendously helpful! Thank
you 8)
Joseph

> --
> When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
> For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
> Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key
> See complete headers for address and phone numbers
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

-- 
Best Regards, Joseph

	You will do foolish things,	
     but do them with enthusiasm.  Colette.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?386FD085.93BFA305>